From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23143 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2007 18:02:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 23126 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2007 18:02:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (HELO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:02:55 +0100 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698A0217515; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:02:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.211]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:02:53 -0400 Received: by web2.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 992D528A5C; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:02:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1176400973.10464.1184305529@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: "Charles Wilson" To: "Steve Ellcey" Cc: dave.korn@artimi.com, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org, newlib@sourceware.org, "Ralf Wildenhues" , aoliva@redhat.com, bonzini@gnu.org, fxcoudert@gmail.com, schwab@suse.de Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface References: <200704121513.IAA09781@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Subject: Re: Final(?) patch to update libtool in GCC and src trees In-Reply-To: <200704121513.IAA09781@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:02:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2 On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:13:00 -0700 (PDT), "Steve Ellcey" > Charles Wilson wrote: > > > But there's still a problem (and this may affect other platforms; > > *should* do so, I think -- so I'm confused by Steve's success here; > > Steve: are you building the src/ stuff separately from the gcc stuff, or > > are you using a combined tree like I am? I think the issue I am seeing > > will affect all platforms, but only if doing a combined build AND when > > --disable-shared is NOT explicitly passed during configure). > > Yes, I build src seperately from gcc. I.e. not a combined tree. Thanks for the clarification. I guess my use of a combined tree exposed a weakness in your libtool patch, but hopefully Paolo's contribution ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00663.html ) will plug that hole, and we can move closer to getting your stuff in-tree. -- Chuck