From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3779 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2007 00:07:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 3771 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Mar 2007 00:07:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.palmsource.com (HELO mx2.palmsource.com) (12.7.175.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:07:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.domain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0A5135250; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.palmsource.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.palmsource.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09183-02-12; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:07:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ussunex01.palmsource.com (unknown [192.168.101.9]) by mx2.palmsource.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3401351A2; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.92.92 ([192.168.92.92]) by ussunex01.palmsource.com ([192.168.101.9]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.palmsource.com ([10.0.20.17]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:07:34 +0000 Received: from svmsnyderlnx by owa.palmsource.com; 12 Mar 2007 17:07:35 -0700 Subject: Re: [commit] Fix checkpoint.exp buffer overflow From: Michael Snyder To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070309152109.GA19189@caradoc.them.org> References: <20070309152109.GA19189@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1173744454.11051.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 10:21 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Related to Ulrich's fix for all-registers yesterday; this should > prevent expect internal errors during checkpoint.exp. I haven't seen > one since I started testing the patch. > Thanks, good idea.