From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17774 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2007 19:11:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 17765 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2007 19:11:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.palmsource.com (HELO mx2.palmsource.com) (12.7.175.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:10:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.domain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A50213648A; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:10:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.palmsource.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.palmsource.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05944-01-22; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ussunex01.palmsource.com (unknown [192.168.101.9]) by mx2.palmsource.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275AF136488; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from 192.168.92.81 ([192.168.92.81]) by ussunex01.palmsource.com ([192.168.101.9]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.palmsource.com ([10.0.20.17]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:10:56 +0000 Received: from svmsnyderlnx by owa.palmsource.com; 07 Mar 2007 11:10:55 -0800 Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: gdbserver: should use __ARCH_HAS_MMU__ rather than __UCLIBC_HAS_MMU__ From: Michael Snyder To: Jon Ringle Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <45EEBA48.5040602@ringle.org> References: <45EE3DD7.80302@ringle.org> <20070307122108.GC18998@caradoc.them.org> <45EEBA48.5040602@ringle.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:11:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1173294655.22513.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 08:12 -0500, Jon Ringle wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:21:43PM -0500, Jon Ringle wrote: > > > >> - if (strcmp ("qSymbol::", own_buf) == 0) > >> + if (strcmp ("qSymbol:", own_buf) == 0) > >> > > > > What's this for? It can't be right. > > > > > Sorry, I must have fat-fingered a DEL key there at some point and didn't > notice it when I posted the patch file. Well, by the way, if that change is in your working gdb, it's likely to prevent thread debugging from working, and might interact with the code that looks at SIGUSR1...