From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24903 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2007 22:40:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 24827 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Feb 2007 22:40:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp04.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:39:53 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1JMtPXl276874 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:55:25 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.243]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.2) with ESMTP id l1JMgJcg176460 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:42:19 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l1JMcnBx027201 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:38:49 +1100 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.190.163.12]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1JMcnTW027197; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:38:49 +1100 Received: from [9.190.6.31] (WECM00-9-190-6-31.au.ibm.com [9.190.6.31]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C8773738; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:38:48 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: sim/sh64 From: Ben Elliston To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Dave Brolley In-Reply-To: <20070219215131.GA8714@caradoc.them.org> References: <20070219215131.GA8714@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:40:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1171924726.13734.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00238.txt.bz2 > I ran gdb_mbuild.sh today and it fell over because I didn't have > sim/sh64. I traced this back to the modules file: > > date: 2002/02/28 06:07:39; author: bje; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 > * Omit sim/testsuite/sim/sh64 for now. > > naked-sim -a !src/sim/sh64 !src/sim/testsuite/sim/sh64 src/sim > > Anyone know what that's about? Can we get rid of it now? It means > sh64 doesn't end up in our tarballs. In 2002 (while working at Red Hat), I contributed the sh64 port. Through a misunderstanding with Cagney on the protocol of GDB submission, it was sidelined with that modules change. It appears that modules change was never reverted. Whether sh64 is included in GDB tarballs is up to the GDB maintainers, but yes, you could get rid of that change (modulo the usual problems of versioning the modules file!) Cheers, Ben