From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-45224-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28869 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2006 10:49:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 28861 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2006 10:49:30 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:49:26 +0000
Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (cam-owa1.emea.arm.com [10.1.255.62]) 	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k71AnNGf021670; 	Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:49:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com ([10.1.255.211]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); 	 Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:49:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Fix returning small structs on OpenBSD/arm
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <200607192125.k6JLPmuV014206@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
References: <200607192125.k6JLPmuV014206@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1154429362.16426.54.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:49:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 22:25, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> On OpenBSD/arm, all structures are returned in memory, i.e. the
> -fpcc-struct-return GCC option is the default.  There are a couple of
> different ways we deal with pcc/reg struct return in GDB.  This adapts
> the way things are done on i386 and m68k.  This makes it easy to
> provide a user command to switch from one convention to the other like
> i386 already has.  However, right now I don't actually see much reason
> to add that option on arm.
> 
> Anyway, this shaves another 80 failures from the testsuite on
> OpenBSD/arm.
> 
> ok?
> 

Yes, this is fine, thanks.

R.