On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:48 -0700, PAUL GILLIAM wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 12:51 -0700, PAUL GILLIAM wrote:
> 
> > You may ask "but what if an architecture needs the old
> > software_single_step functionality *and* has sequences of instructions
> > that need to be atomic?"
> 
> It turns out, there *is* such an architecture and it can have the *same*
> sequences instruction that need to be atomic as PPC:  the RS6000!
> 
> So here is a patch that adds dealing with atomic sequences for the
> RS6000.
> 
> The attach patch assumes that the 'change-software-single-step.diff'
> patch has been applied.
> 
> OK to commit?
> 
> -=# Paul #=-

Damn!  I forget the change log entry...   here is the patch for
rs6000-tdep.c again.

OK to commit?

-=# Paul #=-