From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20417 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2006 15:27:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 20408 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2006 15:27:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from Unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:27:15 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (cam-owa1.emea.arm.com [10.1.255.62]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k5CFPYZ8001018; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:25:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com ([10.1.255.211]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:25:33 +0100 Subject: Re: Failed to detect config.intl at sim/*/configure From: Richard Earnshaw To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Masaki Muranaka , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20060612125826.GA28836@nevyn.them.org> References: <20060612125826.GA28836@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1150125925.21187.56.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:27:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 13:58, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:07:36PM +0900, Masaki Muranaka wrote: > > This can't use with sim because it was linked at not sim/ > > but sim/*/ . > > I've tried to fix it, but I can't see how to get > > the top level build directory. > > > > Would anyone fix it? > > I couldn't see how either - we want $ac_top_builddir but the only way > to set it is undocumented. But, we can just keep trying. Want to try > this patch? I was discussing exactly this problem with Alexander Olivia just last night. I think the patch he proposed to me and which I've run tests on is a bit more general than your solution. I'll post it tonight. R.