From: PAUL GILLIAM <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] Fixes problem setting breakpoint in dynamic loader
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 22:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1148593970.315.131.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060525022635.GA15026@nevyn.them.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2159 bytes --]
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 22:26 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:26:11PM -0700, PAUL GILLIAM wrote:
> > + interp_sect = bfd_get_section_by_name (tmp_bfd, ".plt");
>
> > + interp_sect = bfd_get_section_by_name (tmp_bfd, ".opd");
>
> Magic names...
These aren't magic: they are common to all 64-bit ELF ABIs. Well, ok:
maybe they're enchanted.
>
> > + if (interp_sect != 0)
> > + {
> > + /* Try to convert the function descriptor we found above, into
> > + the address we need. It will be relocated below by adding
> > + "load_addr" to it. */
> > + char *buf = alloca (sizeof (LONGEST));
> > + if (bfd_get_section_contents (tmp_bfd, interp_sect, buf,
> > + sym_addr - sect_offset,
> > + sizeof (LONGEST)))
> > + sym_addr = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, sizeof (LONGEST));
> > + else
> > + sym_addr = 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
>
> ... and a magic load; you have no idea what the format of a function
> descriptor is, at this point.
>
uffda! I'm afraid I was just a little bit ppc64-centric.
> Can you make convert_from_func_ptr_addr do what you need? It needs a
> target_ops; conveniently you've got one (tmp_bfd_target). Some targets
> use a memory read function which honors the supplied target_ops, others
> don't. rs6000's doesn't so you'd need to fix that.
>
Yes! Thank you: "gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr()" does exactly what
I want. And while it's true that "rs6000_convert_from_func_ptr_addr()"
does not use the target_ops, "ppc64_linux_convert_from_func_ptr_addr()"
does and that is the version that is invoked on the configuration
reporting the error I am trying to fix.
I went ahead and converted "rs6000_convert_from_func_ptr_addr()" to use
target_ops, but because I have no way to test the change, I thought it
best to make it a separate patch.
So is it OK to commit the solib-svr4.c patch?
Does anyone want to test the rs6000-tdep.c patch and commit it?
-=# Paul #=-
PS: Uffda is the word a Swed would exclaim when examining the bottom of
their shoe after stepping in a fresh cow-pie or after a similarly
annoying event.
[-- Attachment #2: loader_break.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3280 bytes --]
2006-05-25 Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com
* solib-svr4.c (enable_break): Resolve break address when the
symbol is found in the data section.
Index: solib-svr4.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/solib-svr4.c,v
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -a -u -r1.58 solib-svr4.c
--- solib-svr4.c 18 May 2006 20:38:56 -0000 1.58
+++ solib-svr4.c 25 May 2006 22:12:55 -0000
@@ -85,16 +85,6 @@
"rtld_db_dlactivity",
"_rtld_debug_state",
- /* On the 64-bit PowerPC, the linker symbol with the same name as
- the C function points to a function descriptor, not to the entry
- point. The linker symbol whose name is the C function name
- prefixed with a '.' points to the function's entry point. So
- when we look through this table, we ignore symbols that point
- into the data section (thus skipping the descriptor's symbol),
- and eventually try this one, giving us the real entry point
- address. */
- "._dl_debug_state",
-
NULL
};
@@ -1043,20 +1033,45 @@
/* Now try to set a breakpoint in the dynamic linker. */
for (bkpt_namep = solib_break_names; *bkpt_namep != NULL; bkpt_namep++)
{
- /* On ABI's that use function descriptors, there are usually
- two linker symbols associated with each C function: one
- pointing at the actual entry point of the machine code,
- and one pointing at the function's descriptor. The
- latter symbol has the same name as the C function.
-
- What we're looking for here is the machine code entry
- point, so we are only interested in symbols in code
- sections. */
+ /* What we're looking for here is the machine code entry point,
+ so we are only interested in symbols in code sections.
+
+ On ABI's that use function descriptors, the linker symbol with
+ the same name as a C funtion points to that functions descriptor.
+ when those function descriptors are in the code section, they
+ contain executable code and we can set a breakpoint there. */
sym_addr = bfd_lookup_symbol (tmp_bfd, *bkpt_namep, SEC_CODE);
if (sym_addr != 0)
break;
}
+ if (sym_addr == 0)
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR sect_offset;
+
+ /* No symbol was found in a code section, so look in the data
+ sections. This will only happen when the linker symbol points
+ to a function descriptor that is in a data section. */
+ for (bkpt_namep = solib_break_names; *bkpt_namep!=NULL; bkpt_namep++)
+ {
+ /* On ABI's that use function descriptors that are in the data
+ section, */
+ sym_addr = bfd_lookup_symbol (tmp_bfd, *bkpt_namep, SEC_DATA);
+ if (sym_addr != 0)
+ break;
+ }
+ if (sym_addr == 0)
+ {
+ target_close (tmp_bfd_target, 0);
+ goto bkpt_at_symbol;
+ }
+
+ /* Convert 'sym_addr' from a function pointer to an address. */
+ sym_addr = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (current_gdbarch,
+ sym_addr,
+ tmp_bfd_target);
+ }
+
/* We're done with both the temporary bfd and target. Remember,
closing the target closes the underlying bfd. */
target_close (tmp_bfd_target, 0);
[-- Attachment #3: rs6000.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1286 bytes --]
2006-05-25 Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com
*rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_convert_from_func_ptr_addr): Use target_ops.
Index: rs6000-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.258
diff -a -u -r1.258 rs6000-tdep.c
--- rs6000-tdep.c 23 Apr 2006 14:15:01 -0000 1.258
+++ rs6000-tdep.c 25 May 2006 22:44:07 -0000
@@ -2338,7 +2338,8 @@
inferior's memory space, with all its drawbacks. To be able to
call C++ virtual methods in the inferior (which are called via
function pointers), find_function_addr uses this function to get the
- function address from a function pointer. */
+ function address from a function pointer. It is also used by
+ enable_break from svr4_solib_create_inferior_hook. */
/* Return real function address if ADDR (a function pointer) is in the data
space and is therefore a special function pointer. */
@@ -2355,7 +2356,9 @@
return addr;
/* ADDR is in the data space, so it's a special function pointer. */
- return read_memory_addr (addr, gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch)->wordsize);
+
+ return get_target_memory_unsigned (targ, addr,
+ gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch)->wordsize);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-25 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-25 2:26 PAUL GILLIAM
2006-05-25 16:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-25 22:58 ` PAUL GILLIAM [this message]
2006-05-25 23:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-27 17:52 ` PAUL GILLIAM
2006-06-23 21:33 ` PAUL GILLIAM
2006-06-23 21:48 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-06-26 22:21 ` PAUL GILLIAM
2006-06-26 22:28 ` PAUL GILLIAM
2006-06-26 23:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2006-06-26 18:48 ` Kevin Buettner
2006-06-17 20:21 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-07-06 1:01 ` PAUL GILLIAM
2006-07-06 2:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-06 16:10 ` Kevin Buettner
2006-07-16 18:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-07-19 21:55 ` PAUL GILLIAM
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-27 20:59 [PATCH] " Thiago Jung Bauermann
2007-06-14 23:38 ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-06-20 13:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-20 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-22 14:07 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2007-06-20 14:39 ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-06-25 21:28 ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-07-03 15:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-26 18:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-05-20 6:21 [PATCH] -var-update Nick Roberts
2006-05-20 16:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-21 2:04 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-21 5:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-21 23:04 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-25 0:21 ` Nick Roberts
2006-05-25 0:26 ` [patch] Fixes problem setting breakpoint in dynamic loader PAUL GILLIAM
2006-05-25 0:29 ` PAUL GILLIAM
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1148593970.315.131.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox