From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3900 invoked by alias); 15 May 2006 16:57:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 3892 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2006 16:57:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e1.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:57:44 +0000 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4FGvexx001727 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:57:40 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k4FGveml225614 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:57:40 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4FGve0b018692 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:57:40 -0400 Received: from dufur.beaverton.ibm.com (dufur.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.22.20]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4FGvdL7018664; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:57:39 -0400 Subject: Re: New branch [was Re: RFC: MI output during program execution] From: PAUL GILLIAM Reply-To: pgilliam@us.ibm.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060513022851.GA24947@nevyn.them.org> References: <17458.60694.135878.624750@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060404220637.GA12064@nevyn.them.org> <17486.36188.127822.347550@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060504150414.GE32605@nevyn.them.org> <17508.18716.564160.93092@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060512124331.GA3460@nevyn.them.org> <17510.34460.791254.936961@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060513022851.GA24947@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:58:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1147708442.3672.122.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 22:28 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:23:40PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > > Perhaps I'm confusing things a bit. Maybe mergepoints are just for merging > > HEAD to branch. > > Right. > > > Is any tagging needed when the branch gets merged to HEAD? > > (possibly a bit hypothetical as I realise I may never get that far). > > Not really. Normally, you'll just take the diff from the last > mergepoint to the branch tip, and apply that to HEAD, and declare the > branch dead - or declare the branch dead somewhat before that as the > patch gets reviewed, depending how it works out. > > All this is much easier in non-CVS... > Is it time again to talk about SVN?