From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9901 invoked by alias); 9 May 2005 06:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9844 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2005 06:28:53 -0000 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e2.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.142) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2005 06:28:53 +0000 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j496Sptl001205 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 02:28:51 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j496SoND122024 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 02:28:50 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j496SoEE021685 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 02:28:50 -0400 Received: from imap.linux.ibm.com (imap.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com [9.42.107.100]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j496SSgf020946; Mon, 9 May 2005 02:28:50 -0400 Received: by imap.linux.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id A77997C01F; Mon, 9 May 2005 02:28:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 9.181.134.123 ([9.181.134.123]) by imap.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 02:28:28 -0400 Message-ID: <1115620108.427f030c71205@imap.linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 12:42:00 -0000 From: Wu Zhou To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: about how to add support to new c++ compiler in GDB MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.7 X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 Hi Daniel, Thanks a lot for your kind consideration. A week passed. Did you have any plan to look into these questions in a near future? P.S: I am not trying to be annoying, just curious to know whether you have any plan on this. Thanks. - Wu Zhou Quoting Daniel Jacobowitz : > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 03:27:49PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote: > > > BTW. I had verify your patch, It did worked. No SEGV error any more. > > > Althought there are still some error, most of them should be XLC specific > > I > > > believe. I could work with XLC guys to improve them. > > > > Daniel, after playing with your patch for some more time, I had the > > following questions. Would you please answer these? Thanks a lot! > > I am afraid that I'm not going to have time to answer these questions > for a while :-( I'll get back to you about them, but I wanted to let > you know that I did see them. I'll have to dig my head back into this > code to answer them. > > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > CodeSourcery, LLC > > Cheers - Wu Zhou