From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-38609-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 10130 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2005 15:47:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8473 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 15:46:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2005 15:46:51 -0000
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2TFk54G006078;
	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:46:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j2TFkJIF012782;
	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:46:19 +0100
Received: (from rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j2TFkJBL012780;
	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:46:19 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha set sender to rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org using -f
Subject: Re: [rfa] Use dwarf2 unwinding on ARM
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <20050325211209.GA2461@nevyn.them.org>
References: <20050325211209.GA2461@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: GNU
Message-Id: <1112111179.12337.9.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:47:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2

On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 21:12, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> We talked last year about turning on dwarf2-based unwinding for ARM.  The
> problem was that older versions of GCC would emit incorrect unwind
> information for Thumb functions, but that's been fixed for a while
> now; I think it's time to throw the switch in GDB.
> 
> Committed to csl-arm-20050325-branch.  OK for HEAD?

I'd forgotten that we hadn't.  Yes, this is ok for head too.

R.