From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-37140-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 925 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2004 14:47:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 667 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 14:46:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 14:46:49 -0000
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iATEjvmb006533;
	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:45:57 GMT
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iATEkjrg005148;
	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:46:45 GMT
Received: (from rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id iATEkfbB005146;
	Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:46:41 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha set sender to rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org using -f
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Output execution stats from ARM simulator
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
To: jbeniston@compxs.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <001d01c4d620$edbb9e50$0bbda8c0@Kindrogan>
References: <001d01c4d620$edbb9e50$0bbda8c0@Kindrogan>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: GNU
Message-Id: <1101739601.1585.44.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:47:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00514.txt.bz2

On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 14:37, Jon Beniston wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The attached patch outputs the number of instructions executed and the
> number of cycles taken by the ARM simulator.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jon
> 
> 2004-11-29  Jon Beniston  <jon@beniston.com>
> 
>         * wrapper.c (sim_info): Output number of instructions
>         executed and number of cycles taken to execute them.

While I don't see anything wrong with your patch, I'm not sure whether
that information is accurately tracked any more.  So the numbers
probably aren't meaningful, especially for any core other than an ARM7
(and I don't mean an ARM7TDMI either).

R.