From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67519 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2016 15:18:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 67504 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2016 15:18:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=clears, Hx-languages-length:923 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:18:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E866FC057FA7; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9TFIoDg016084; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:18:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/NEWS: Mention C++11 requirement To: Eli Zaretskii References: <1477596094-3244-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <426db43e-25e2-8eb6-71f3-30e00e28b64e@redhat.com> <83wpgrr8ci.fsf@gnu.org> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <10b3ff78-b007-9088-ee8c-c3282df1c0b4@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 15:18:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83wpgrr8ci.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00836.txt.bz2 On 10/29/2016 07:13 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" >> From: Pedro Alves >> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:17:44 +0100 >> >> On 10/28/2016 04:08 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> On 10/28/2016 01:07 PM, Yao Qi wrote: >> >>>> This series is good to me. >>> >>> Thanks! I've pushed it in now. I'll send a NEWS change soon. >> >> Maybe this is sufficient? > > Fine with me. > Thanks I've pushed it in. Reading the text back, I wonder if this would sound clearer/more natural: -* GDB and GDBserver now require building with a C++11 compiler. +* Building GDB and GDBserver now requires a C++11 compiler. I realized that what I had written originally may be ambiguous with saying that we require building inferiors/debuggees with C++11. Reading the paragraph below clears it up, but ... Thanks, Pedro Alves