From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5461 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2004 00:08:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5343 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2004 00:08:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (80.6.110.86) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2004 00:08:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9E0Eqxt012618; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:14:54 +0100 Subject: Re: [commit] Use full paths for "info sources" From: David Lecomber To: Joel Brobecker Cc: dan@debian.org, patches In-Reply-To: <20041013232403.GU1375@gnat.com> References: <1095776238.14044.8.camel@elmo.priv.wark.uk.streamline-computing.com> <20040921153013.GA15014@nevyn.them.org> <20040924211628.GC11798@gnat.com> <1097605852.9994.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041013232403.GU1375@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1097712892.11117.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:08:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 Hi Joel, > > I haven't reviewed the entire thread yet. Was this something really > bad. Or is it just duplication we get in the output, and that's it? One problem is that things appear in the info sources, and info source, and in the stack traces, with different paths. So once you've got your definitive path for a file, you then see it referred to in a different way when you start using it. Work-roundable for the user I guess, but less than ideal. Cheers David