Hi Daniel,

It's attached,

D.

On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 22:04, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:11:30PM +0100, David Lecomber wrote:
> > All,
> > 
> > f90 compiled with nested subroutines using Intel's compiler is handled
> > badly by GDB.  Line numbers are not found by backtrace.
> > 
> > Although GDB is capable of reading out all the dwarf2 line information
> > inside this routine correctly, it can't look up an address to get a line
> > number when inside a block.  The cause is that the containing function's
> > block does not contain the contained function's address. 
> 
> Could you post the output of readelf -wil on this binary?