From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1848 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2004 23:40:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1831 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 23:40:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com) (81.105.116.12) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 23:40:50 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6KNu8Ih032090; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:56:08 +0100 Subject: Re: Dwarf2 Producer info From: David Lecomber To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: patches In-Reply-To: <20040720231756.GA8250@nevyn.them.org> References: <1090362598.21483.108.camel@cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> <20040720231756.GA8250@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1090367767.21483.120.camel@cpc4-oxfd5-5-0-cust12.oxfd.cable.ntl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:40:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 > Is set_cu_producer going to do anything else? Otherwise I don't see > the point of the wrapper function. Hi Dan, Not in the immediately foreseeable future, but I can imagine a situation where the producer is matched with some known producer strings and an enumerated constant is stored instead; if that ever happens, it will be better if there's one setter. BTW, there's also a processing_gcc_compilation in dwarf2read which is not taking any notice of producers; I've not changed that but someone might want to, maybe.. Cheers David