Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>,
	Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Use prototype to call libc functions
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 11:26:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089e785-7092-95c8-9e91-f07f8348d98b@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220907104106.099b2c4d@f35-zws-1>

On 9/7/22 19:41, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 14:27:07 +0200
> Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> On openSUSE Tumbleweed (using glibc 2.36), I run into:
>> ...
>> (gdb) print /d (int) munmap (4198400, 4096)^M
>> Invalid cast.^M
>> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/break-main-file-remove-fail.exp: cmdline: \
>>    get integer valueof "(int) munmap (4198400, 4096)"
>> ...
>>
>> The problem is that after starting the executable, the symbol has type
>> "void (*) (void)":
>> ...
>> (gdb) p munmap
>> $1 = {<text variable, no debug info>} 0x401030 <munmap@plt>
>> (gdb) start
>>    ...
>> (gdb) p munmap
>> $2 = {void (void)} 0x7ffff7feb9a0 <__GI_munmap>
>> ...
>> which causes the "Invalid cast" error.
>>
>> Looking at the debug info for glibc for symbol __GI_munmap:
>> ...
>>   <0><189683>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit)
>>      <189691>   DW_AT_name        : ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S
>>      <189699>   DW_AT_producer    : GNU AS 2.39.0
>> <1><1896ae>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
>>      <1896af>   DW_AT_name        : __GI___munmap
>>      <1896b3>   DW_AT_external    : 1
>>      <1896b4>   DW_AT_low_pc      : 0x10cad0
>>      <1896bc>   DW_AT_high_pc     : 37
>> ...
>> that's probably caused by this bit (or similar bits for other munmap aliases).
>>
>> This is fixed in gas on trunk by commit 5578fbf672e ("GAS: Add a return type
>> tag to DWARF DIEs generated for function symbols").
>>
>> Work around this (for say gas 2.39) by explicitly specifying the prototype for
>> munmap.
>>
>> Likewise for getpid in a couple of other test-cases.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>>
>> Any comments?
> 
> I have mixed feelings about patches like this.
> 
> One the one hand, it's nice to have the test "fixed" so that it doesn't
> fail.
> 
> But, on the other hand, this failure found a problem with the debug info
> in glibc, so fixing it as you did here will remove that test.
> 
> Perhaps you could add a new test which will still fail when the debug info
> incorrectly specifies that munmap has a void return type?

Hi Kevin,

thanks for the review.

Alternatively, I could have marked these xfails, because they represent 
a failure in the environment, not in gdb.  But I think that if we can 
avoid xfails by working around them, we should, because it simplifies 
testsuite maintenance.

The fact that we no longer use that libc debuginfo is fine from the 
point of view of the gdb testsuite being a regression test suite for gdb.

That does beg the question, where else would libc debuginfo be tested, 
and I don't know where, so perhaps we could have some dedicated gdb.libc 
testsuite subdir for that.  I would put the test you propose in there.

What is useful about the proposed test is that it eventually (once the 
new binutils release makes it into the various distros) will test the 
munmap debuginfo as generated by the fixed gas, that is, using 
DW_TAG_unspecified_type.

We don't seem to have a dedicated test for this tag.  There's some 
ada-specific bit in the code in gdb/dwarf/read.c handling this, which is 
supposed to be tested by gdb.ada/taft_type.exp, but how it will behave 
with the fixed gas, I have no idea.

So, can we already test this now?  Let's try: 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29558 .  AFAIU, the 
generated dwarf is incorrect, so I've filed a gas PR for that.

We can rewrite this into a gdb test-case, which would test gas debuginfo 
(so gdb.gas subdir?), but I guess we'd probably also want a dwarf 
assembly test-case.

Thanks,
- Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-08  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-05 12:27 Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-09-07  8:01 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-09-07 17:41 ` Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches
2022-09-08  9:26   ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches [this message]
2022-09-08 10:15   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1089e785-7092-95c8-9e91-f07f8348d98b@suse.de \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox