From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94764 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2017 10:12:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 93851 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jun 2017 10:12:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=confirming X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:12:15 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3164C060209; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:12:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com A3164C060209 Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=palves@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com A3164C060209 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF49600C1; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] Adjust the order of 32bit-linux.xml and 32bit-sse.xml in i386/i386-linux.xml To: Yao Qi References: <1497256916-4958-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <1497256916-4958-3-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <9a60c2a9-09ef-c21a-db18-385105d986a1@redhat.com> <2469fcc8da14028094caf53330145210@polymtl.ca> <7872d3fa-7131-d84c-483d-05eca415ca63@redhat.com> <86efuf582m.fsf@gmail.com> Cc: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <10837b9e-050a-4021-ab33-335e8cc4088e@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:12:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <86efuf582m.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00558.txt.bz2 On 06/20/2017 10:20 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > This patch doesn't change the registers layout in gdbserver, because > gdb/regformats/i386/i386-linux.dat isn't affected by this patch. ... > It > determines the register layout for i386-linux, in which "orig_eax" is > already put the end of list, thanks to sort-regs.xsl. Ok, that's for gdbserver, while I was worrying more about gdb, but it's a good hint. The feature xml files hardcode register numbers, and the move ends up being a nop. Good. > > This patch only changes the order of iterating features and registers in > GDB, however, the order doesn't matter. > > The GDB's understanding to g/G packet layout is not changed, verified by > "maintenance print remote-registers", Great, thanks for confirming. Thanks, Pedro Alves