From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5125 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2004 05:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5105 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 05:37:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 05:37:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 32717 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 05:37:24 -0000 Received: from 227.148-60-66-fuji-dsl.static.surewest.net (HELO minax.codesourcery.com) (mitchell@66.60.148.227) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 05:37:24 -0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctly on AMD64 From: Mark Mitchell To: Jan Hubicka Cc: Mark Kettenis , drow@mvista.com, aj@suse.de, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040111132924.GA1964@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <200401101800.i0AI0Zm6026623@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040110183622.GA8108@nevyn.them.org> <200401101858.i0AIwdhk032901@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040111041009.GA15714@nevyn.them.org> <200401111237.i0BCbVPL010349@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040111132924.GA1964@kam.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC Message-Id: <1073885852.3462.24.camel@minax.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:37:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00308.txt.bz2 > This seems obviously wrong to me. If you do have testcase, you may want > to fill it in GCC bugzilla. Especially if you can write simple testcase > that fails when copy constructor is not properly used. > I hope that Mark or Jason can take a look into this issue themselves. Jan's advise is exactly correct; you should file a bug report in Bugzilla and then we can take a look. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC