From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18371 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2003 03:58:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18364 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2003 03:58:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (199.72.38.5) by sources.redhat.com with QMTP; 9 Sep 2003 03:58:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 25628 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2003 03:58:08 -0000 Received: from cpe-24-221-209-215.co.sprintbbd.net (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (24.221.209.215) by external1.doc.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2003 03:58:08 -0000 Subject: Re: [RFC]: Better ObjC symbol skipping in decode_line_1 From: Adam Fedor To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Elena Zannoni , David Ayers , "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" In-Reply-To: <3F5CD159.6090609@redhat.com> References: <1059663909.1116.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3F5C882D.4010208@inode.at> <16220.53209.420727.819654@localhost.redhat.com> <3F5CD159.6090609@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1063079886.1018.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 03:58:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 12:58, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > I don't think it would do any harm on gdb-6. So it could go in, if > > changes are still allowed. > > ok. > Done. Also ran the testsuite before and after just to be paranoid.