Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF

Andrew Cagney
2003-04-25T02:15:10Z

> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 03:29:36PM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 15:18, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> > BTW, does ...
>> >
>> > struct t
>> > {
>> > int a;
>> > int b;
>> > };
>> >
>> > typedef struct t T;
>> >
>> > main()
>> > {
>> > static T v = {...};
>> > }
>> >
>> > tickle it?
>
>>
>> Nope, that works properly (except for it being reported as "struct t"
>> instead of "T").
>
>
> [Keith, you had "test for insight/792" in your posted testsuite patch.]
>
> There's at least one compiler bug in this area, where DWARF-2 debug info
> will say struct t instead of T. I fixed it for 3.3 and (I think?)
> 3.2.3. Just in case you start getting confused :)

So, rather than `bug', `probable gcc bug'?

Andrew