From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-24076-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20260 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2003 22:27:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20252 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2003 22:27:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2003 22:27:23 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3OMRND08951
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:27:23 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3OMRMq04066;
	Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:27:22 -0400
Received: from [150.1.200.14] (vpn50-53.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.53])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3OMRMh12595;
	Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:27:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF
From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EA8629B.50603@redhat.com>
References: <1051215397.1538.43.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com>
	 <3EA84A9B.5020308@redhat.com>
	 <1051221433.1534.72.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com>  <3EA8629B.50603@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1051223376.1538.74.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:18:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00477.txt.bz2

On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 15:18, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> BTW, does ...
> 
> struct t
> {
>    int a;
>    int b;
> };
> 
> typedef struct t T;
> 
> main()
> {
>    static T v = {...};
> }
> 
> tickle it?

Nope, that works properly (except for it being reported as "struct t"
instead of "T").

Keith