From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30169 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2003 21:51:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30162 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2003 21:51:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2003 21:51:41 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3OLpfD26122 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:51:41 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3OLpfq19868 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:51:41 -0400 Received: from [150.1.200.14] (vpn50-53.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.53]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3OLpeh08916 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:51:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF From: Keith Seitz To: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" In-Reply-To: <20030424204748.GA5955@nevyn.them.org> References: <1051215397.1538.43.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <20030424201853.GA5398@nevyn.them.org> <1051217215.1538.62.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <20030424204748.GA5955@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1051221233.1538.67.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 22:18:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 13:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > The important question is whether get_type is ever used to display the > object's type; in which case we should say Bar, not "struct foo". Yes, I think this is already a buglet in varobj. Now that I understand the whole CHECK_TYPEDEF thing, I'll file a bug report for it. Keith