From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7009 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2003 18:09:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7000 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 18:09:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 13 Feb 2003 18:09:05 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1DI95f07291 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:09:05 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1DI95a32142 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:09:05 -0500 Received: from [150.1.200.14] (vpn50-27.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.27]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1DI94906883 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:09:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFA] Make interpreter_p an argument for gdb_main From: Keith Seitz To: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" In-Reply-To: <3E4BD3DA.1080308@redhat.com> References: <1045011304.1493.43.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <3E4A7A20.30403@redhat.com> <1045071488.1787.35.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <3E4BD3DA.1080308@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1045160039.1490.22.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:09:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00308.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 09:20, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > ChangeLog > > 2003-02-12 Keith R Seitz > > > > * main.h (struct captured_main_args): Add interpreter_p. > > * main.c (captured_main): Initialize interpreter_p from context. > > * gdb.c (main): Set interpreter_p argument. > > * Makefile.in (gdb.o): Add dependency for interps.h. > > Yes, ok. Committed. Thank you for looking at this. > I think, now, for Insight, just need to get .../-main.c and gdbtk.c to > agree on the interpreter's name (what ever it is). I'll submit the argv0 thing shortly. Keith