From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11219 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2003 21:24:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11212 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 21:24:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2003 21:24:22 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hALLOMH27259 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:24:22 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hALLOMw30250; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:24:22 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-29.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.29]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hALLOL89010109; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:24:21 -0500 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id hALLOGb17981; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:24:16 -0700 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:24:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1031121212415.ZM17980@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz "Re: [rfa:symtab] deprecate inside_entry_func" (Nov 21, 4:04pm) References: <3FA2F940.5040102@redhat.com> <3FBE6D46.4070201@redhat.com> <20031121195949.GA794@nevyn.them.org> <3FBE79B6.2090209@redhat.com> <20031121204833.GA2356@nevyn.them.org> <3FBE7BD8.2090601@redhat.com> <20031121210412.GA2627@nevyn.them.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:symtab] deprecate inside_entry_func MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 On Nov 21, 4:04pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I imagine the third caller, in frv-tdep.c, is bogus > and could be removed somehow. But if it's going to be left there then > it seems reasonable to update it also. I had thought that get_prev_frame's call to inside_entry_func() had been disabled pending a demonstration that it's needed. Hmm... I see I was getting this confused with the code corresponding to inside_entry_file(). Okay, that means that frv-tdep.c's use of inside_entry_func() can go away. I'll get rid of it. Kevin