From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8579 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2003 17:01:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8571 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2003 17:01:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Nov 2003 17:01:19 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAHH1IH18538 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:01:18 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAHH1Gw08180; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:01:16 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-24.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.24]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAHH1Eg0012125; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:01:15 -0500 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id hAHH19V31803; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:01:09 -0700 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:01:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1031117170108.ZM31802@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: "J. Johnston" "Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch updated" (Nov 14, 4:24pm) References: <3F986E31.8050201@redhat.com> <1031024175718.ZM3475@localhost.localdomain> <3F996D88.9060505@redhat.com> <1031024185625.ZM9827@localhost.localdomain> <3F9F0180.2010702@redhat.com> <20031029012833.GA11070@nevyn.them.org> <3FA043B2.6090401@redhat.com> <3FA7F97B.4090909@redhat.com> <3FAA830F.50607@redhat.com> <3FB54806.6060000@redhat.com> To: "J. Johnston" , Andrew Cagney , Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: RFA: ia64 portion of libunwind patch updated Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Daniel Jacobowitz , Marcel Moolenaar MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 On Nov 14, 4:24pm, J. Johnston wrote: > In light of the recent checked-in patches concerning libunwind and > the resolved issues, is the ia64-tdep.c patch ok now? The issue > regarding whether libunwind could more efficiently reference the > table entries will require an ABI change to libunwind and needs some > thought from David. Would you mind posting an updated patch? Thanks, Kevin