From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21024 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2003 16:25:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21017 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2003 16:25:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2003 16:25:18 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hA7GPIM28922 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:25:18 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hA7GPI616030 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:25:18 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-2.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.2]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hA7GPHH8027106; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:25:17 -0500 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id hA7GPBk17580; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:25:11 -0700 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 16:25:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1031107162511.ZM17579@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "[rfa:ppc] Convert PPC to "return_value"" (Oct 20, 7:27pm) References: <3F946F56.2050409@redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:ppc] Convert PPC to "return_value" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 On Oct 20, 7:27pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > The attached switches the PPC architectures over to the new > "return_value" gdbarch method. Due to a lack of coverage in the > testsuite, this change doesn't actually improve the existing test > results (ppc64 GNU/Linux and ppc32 NetBSD). > > Consequently, I wrote some new tests (will post in next few days) that > beef up the testsuite and, with them, the results definitly improve! > > Anyway, ok to commit? Okay. (Though I remain unconvinced that the new interface is superior to the old.) Kevin