From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21343 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2003 03:33:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21212 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2003 03:32:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2003 03:32:48 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9T3WlM28818 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:32:47 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9T3Wl630360 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:32:47 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-2.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.2]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9T3Wkju031157; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:32:46 -0500 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h9T3Wff04677; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:32:41 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 03:33:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1031029033241.ZM4676@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "Re: [patch/rfc,rfa:ppc64] Add osabi wildcard support" (Oct 27, 6:54pm) References: <3F986371.9060708@redhat.com> <1031028215919.ZM3764@localhost.localdomain> <3F9DB049.10603@redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney , Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: [patch/rfc,rfa:ppc64] Add osabi wildcard support Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00830.txt.bz2 On Oct 27, 6:54pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > preferences? > > > > At the moment, I prefer the explicit registration of architecture > > variants. I'd prefer to wait on adding the wildcard mechanism until a > > more compelling need for it is demonstrated. > > Per the discussion between myself and daniel, the current proposal is to > add: > > > > gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_powerpc, bfd_mach_ppc, ... > > > gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_powerpc, bfd_mach_ppc64, ... > > > > > plus, I believe, either > > + gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_rs6000, bfd_mach_rs6k); > > to the linux file. Is that pre-approved? Yes. Kevin