From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9881 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2003 21:23:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9873 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2003 21:23:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2003 21:23:35 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h93LNZ111804 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 17:23:35 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h93LNZc32608 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 17:23:35 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-46.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.46]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h93LNXbe007142; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 17:23:34 -0400 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h93LNSr26633; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:23:28 -0700 Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 21:23:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1031003212328.ZM26632@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "Re: [rfa:ppc64] Fix return value" (Oct 3, 5:10pm) References: <3F6CF27D.9040500@redhat.com> <1030922232300.ZM30081@localhost.localdomain> <3F7DE5AB.7000904@redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney , Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: [rfa:ppc64] Fix return value Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On Oct 3, 5:10pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Anyway, ok to commit? > > > > Yes, okay. > > I've committed it with one tweak. The ..._return_value() method now > returns "enum return_value_convention" instead of an int. This is to > better align its function signature with the new gdbarch_return_value > method I've posted. Sounds good. Kevin