From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23972 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2003 19:02:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23964 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2003 19:02:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Jul 2003 19:02:44 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h62J2iH27416 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:02:44 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h62J2hI10607; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:02:43 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-30.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.30]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h62J2gE07193; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:02:42 -0400 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h62J2X802149; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:02:33 -0700 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 19:02:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1030702190233.ZM2148@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz "Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptype pattern" (Jul 2, 2:32pm) References: <200307021649.h62GnKLW026005@duracef.shout.net> <20030702183257.GA8828@nevyn.them.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz , David Carlton Subject: Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptype pattern Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 On Jul 2, 2:32pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Eh, I believe Kevin B. did it: > > 2002-05-22 Kevin Buettner > > * dbxout.c (dbxout_class_name_qualifiers): New function. > (dbxout_symbol): Output class/struct qualifiers for a .stabs entry. > > Ask him about it instead of blaming GCC... See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg01715.html (where I explain the motivation behind this change). Yes, I should've cc'd this list. Kevin