From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2485 invoked by alias); 16 May 2003 23:05:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2455 invoked from network); 16 May 2003 23:05:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 May 2003 23:05:58 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4GN5wH05764 for ; Fri, 16 May 2003 19:05:58 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4GN5vI19542; Fri, 16 May 2003 19:05:57 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-3.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.3]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4GN5uQ10640; Fri, 16 May 2003 19:05:56 -0400 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4GN5oF12583; Fri, 16 May 2003 16:05:50 -0700 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 23:05:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1030516230550.ZM12582@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: cgd@broadcom.com "Re: [WIP/RFC] MIPS registers overhaul" (May 16, 3:50pm) References: <1030510002453.ZM3880@localhost.localdomain> <3EBD6131.30209@redhat.com> <1030514220025.ZM10373@localhost.localdomain> <3EC461C1.1080104@redhat.com> To: cgd@broadcom.com, ac131313@redhat.com Subject: Re: [WIP/RFC] MIPS registers overhaul Cc: "Kevin Buettner" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 On May 16, 3:50pm, cgd@broadcom.com wrote: > another reasonable way (but less efficient on a 64-bit part with a > 64-bit FPU) would be: > > 0: > 1: This is how the mips64 o32 rda transfers the FP registers. Kevin