From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28502 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2003 16:32:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28495 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2003 16:32:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 28 Jan 2003 16:32:50 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0SG3Xf24257 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:03:33 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0SGWna08654; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:32:49 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-39.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.39]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0SGWmt15051; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:32:48 -0500 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0SGWc905263; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:32:38 -0700 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:32:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1030128163238.ZM5262@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "Re: [RFA] mips-tdep.c: Fix inferior function call breakage" (Jan 28, 8:14am) References: <1030123072642.ZM24777@localhost.localdomain> <3E3057F0.5000906@redhat.com> <1030124035453.ZM29667@localhost.localdomain> <3E3586B9.9080100@redhat.com> <1030127195746.ZM23807@localhost.localdomain> <3E35B9B2.5060104@redhat.com> <1030127235721.ZM2609@localhost.localdomain> <3E368244.3020300@redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: [RFA] mips-tdep.c: Fix inferior function call breakage Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00760.txt.bz2 On Jan 28, 8:14am, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> - Modify mips_init_extra_frame_info() to return immediatly when a dummy > >> frame. > > > > I'm more confident in this solution. See below. Okay? > > Yes. Committed.