From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: PowerPC/Linux signal handlers
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1030117165530.ZM29286@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> "RFC: PowerPC/Linux signal handlers" (Jan 17, 10:12am)
On Jan 17, 10:12am, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Kevin, any comments on this patch?
It's fine with me so long as the new function is indented to adhere to
GNU coding standards.
> [From a copyright perspective I think it's OK; this is an obvious patch
> once someone tells us that the used syscall numbers have changed.
> Anyone have a different opinion?]
I agree, but wait a few days for dissenting opinions.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-17 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-17 15:12 Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 18:55 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2003-02-04 18:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1030117165530.ZM29286@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox