From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12011 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2002 18:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12002 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 18:10:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 18:10:14 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBDHiOP02356 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 12:44:24 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBDIACD07994; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:10:12 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-3.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.3]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBDIABY24146; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:10:11 -0500 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBDIA6V21105; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:10:06 -0700 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 12:21:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1021213181006.ZM21104@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "Re: [RFA] Multiarch NUM_REGS for MIPS" (Dec 12, 7:42pm) References: <1021213001947.ZM11112@localhost.localdomain> <3DF92CE5.1000302@redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: [RFA] Multiarch NUM_REGS for MIPS Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00423.txt.bz2 On Dec 12, 7:42pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Er, multi-arch is pretty obvious. Hmm, > > > static struct mips_extra_func_info temp_proc_desc; > > -static CORE_ADDR temp_saved_regs[NUM_REGS]; > > +static CORE_ADDR *temp_saved_regs; > > Ah! Can you just add a comment here saying something like: > > ``This hack will go away once the get_prev_frame() code has been > modified to set the frame's type first. That is BEFORE init extra frame > info et.al. is called. This is because it will become possible to skip > the init extra info call for sigtramp and dummy frames.'' Done... and comitted. Kevin