From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [RFA] Top level configury additions for RDA (2nd try)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1021018181007.ZM9592@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Okay, let's try this again...
Any objections to the following additions to the top level configury?
(Thanks to DJ and Nathanael for telling me about Makefile.def and autogen.)
* Makefile.def (host_modules): Add rda.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* configure.in (configdirs): Add rda to list of directories
to configure for certain hosts.
Index: Makefile.def
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/Makefile.def,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3 Makefile.def
--- Makefile.def 2 Oct 2002 06:29:04 -0000 1.3
+++ Makefile.def 18 Oct 2002 17:58:19 -0000
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ host_modules= { module= patch; };
host_modules= { module= perl; };
host_modules= { module= prms; };
host_modules= { module= rcs; };
+host_modules= { module= rda; };
host_modules= { module= readline; };
host_modules= { module= release; no_install= true; no_check= true; };
host_modules= { module= recode; };
Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -u -p -r1.76 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in 3 Oct 2002 19:08:53 -0000 1.76
+++ Makefile.in 18 Oct 2002 17:58:20 -0000
@@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ ALL_MODULES = \
all-perl \
all-prms \
all-rcs \
+ all-rda \
all-readline \
all-release \
all-recode \
@@ -633,6 +634,7 @@ CROSS_CHECK_MODULES = \
check-perl \
check-prms \
check-rcs \
+ check-rda \
check-readline \
check-recode \
check-sed \
@@ -697,6 +699,7 @@ INSTALL_MODULES = \
install-perl \
install-prms \
install-rcs \
+ install-rda \
install-readline \
install-recode \
install-sed \
@@ -859,6 +862,7 @@ CLEAN_MODULES = \
clean-perl \
clean-prms \
clean-rcs \
+ clean-rda \
clean-readline \
clean-release \
clean-recode \
Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.113
diff -u -p -r1.113 configure.in
--- configure.in 7 Oct 2002 16:40:56 -0000 1.113
+++ configure.in 18 Oct 2002 17:58:20 -0000
@@ -205,6 +205,18 @@ case "${host}" in
configdirs="$configdirs libtermcap dosrel" ;;
esac
+# rda is known to build only for some specific hosts
+case "${host}" in
+ *-solaris*)
+ configdirs="$configdirs rda" ;;
+ *-linux*)
+ configdirs="$configdirs rda" ;;
+ *-cygwin*)
+ configdirs="$configdirs rda" ;;
+ *-freebsd*|*-netbsd*|*-openbsd*)
+ configdirs="$configdirs rda" ;;
+esac
+
# Remove more programs from consideration, based on the host or
# target this usually means that a port of the program doesn't
# exist yet.
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-18 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 11:10 Kevin Buettner [this message]
2002-10-18 11:20 ` DJ Delorie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1021018181007.ZM9592@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox