From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-19420-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 512 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2002 20:31:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 505 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2002 20:31:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Oct 2002 20:31:31 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9HKAew02176
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:10:40 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9HKVUf02700;
	Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:31:30 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-3.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.3])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9HKVTT09399;
	Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:31:29 -0400
Received: (from kev@localhost)
	by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9HKVNl10257;
	Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:31:23 -0700
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:31:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1021017203123.ZM10256@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
        "Re: [PATCH RFA] New constvars.exp tests" (Oct 17,  4:06pm)
References: <1021010203259.ZM16308@localhost.localdomain> 
	<3DAF185B.7010100@redhat.com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] New constvars.exp tests
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2

On Oct 17,  4:06pm, Fernando Nasser wrote:

> This looks good.  If I am not mistaken, your patch that fixes the 
> printing has been already committed so these tests will either PASS or 
> XFAIL.

You're right; the patch is in, but I recall seeing XPASSes for my new
tests (along with a lot of other tests) when I used Dwarf 2.  I
suspect that something's going wrong with the following code:

proc local_compiler_xfail_check { } {
    global gcc_compiled;

    if {$gcc_compiled} then {
	if { ![test_debug_format "HP"] \
		&& ![test_debug_format "DWARF 2"] } then {
	    setup_xfail "*-*-*" 
	}
    }
}

I'm double checking and looking into it now...

Kevin