From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-18967-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 3688 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2002 19:05:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 3671 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2002 19:05:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2002 19:05:23 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8QIlGi24128
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:47:16 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8QJ5Kf16976;
	Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:05:20 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-15.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.15])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8QJ5JJ09720;
	Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:05:19 -0400
Received: (from kev@localhost)
	by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8QJ5DC19272;
	Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:05:13 -0700
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:05:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1020926190513.ZM19271@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
        "Re: [rfc/rfa:doco] Use @sc{gdb}?" (Sep 26,  1:40pm)
References: <3D66B84F.6010803@ges.redhat.com> 
	<2593-Sat24Aug2002123336+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> 
	<3D934695.1020306@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa:doco] Use @sc{gdb}?
Cc: ac131313@ges.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00641.txt.bz2

On Sep 26,  1:40pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> >> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:33:51 -0400
> >> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
> >> 
> >> I got annoyed at all the GDB's in the formatted manual being really 
> >> large so tried changing them to @sc{gdb}.  It fixed that problem but I'm 
> >> not sure that I like the final result :-)  (You'll need to build 
> >> gdb.pdf, gdb ps or gdb.dvi).
> >> 
> >> Is there a style guide thing on this one?  Eli?
> > 
> > 
> > There are no strict rules on this one, AFAIK.  If the results of
> > @sc{gdb} look nice to people, let's do it; if not, let's not.
> > 
> > Personally, I like the results of @sc in such cases.
> 
> So, decision time.  Trunk and 5.3 branch?

Having just been through this with GNU vs @sc{gnu}, I think it makes
sense to do it for GDB.

Andrew, what bothered you about the result?  (You said that you weren't
sure that you liked the final result.)

Kevin