From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21899 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2002 22:59:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21891 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2002 22:59:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2002 22:59:38 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8PMfdi29151 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:41:39 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8PMxbf02373; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:59:37 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-41.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.41]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8PMxaJ28256; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:59:36 -0400 Received: (from kev@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8PMxUP15135; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:59:30 -0700 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:59:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020925225930.ZM15134@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: "Eli Zaretskii" "Re: [RFA] gdb.texinfo: Use GNU/Linux instead of Linux" (Sep 21, 11:35am) References: <1020921004722.ZM28135@localhost.localdomain> <9628-Sat21Sep2002113551+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb.texinfo: Use GNU/Linux instead of Linux Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00626.txt.bz2 On Sep 21, 11:35am, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I think in gdb.texinfo the convention is to use @sc{gnu} throughout. Okay. > As for GNU/Linux, I'd suggest first to see whether @sc{gnu}/Linux > looks fine in print, and then decide. Kevin, could you please TeX the > manual and see whether the result is plausible? Prior to this, I'd generated html and could see no difference. This time I generated a pdf file. ``@sc{gnu}'' generates slightly smaller characters and looks quite nice (IMO). > Otherwise, okay. Thanks. Committed. Kevin