From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32141 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2002 23:55:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32133 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2002 23:55:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2002 23:55:15 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8KNbli24803 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 19:37:47 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8KNtDh22167; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 19:55:13 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (IDENT:qVxOCsUslX9aIh7Nlju3pUjbvm5SqIq3@romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8KNt8C22308; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:55:08 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8KNpvR27881; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:51:57 -0700 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:55:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020920235157.ZM27880@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "Re: [PATCH RFC] Character set support" (Sep 20, 12:08pm) References: <1020913003056.ZM15701@localhost.localdomain> <1020920003625.ZM23109@localhost.localdomain> <3D8A75F3.3040704@ges.redhat.com> <1020920071148.ZM24070@localhost.localdomain> <3D8B47E9.5020100@ges.redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Character set support Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00544.txt.bz2 On Sep 20, 12:08pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Did the WCHAR problem get resolved? > > > > Yes, in the sense that we're taking Jim's patch as-is and we'll > > worry about wchar_t changes at some later date. > > > > See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00261.html > > Can you please at least create a bug report ``some later date'' work can > be tracked? Done. See gdb/716.