From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3976 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2002 07:12:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3938 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2002 07:11:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2002 07:11:58 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8K6sai24129 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 02:54:36 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8K7Btx27063; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:11:56 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (IDENT:YFhjP9vuNI0IFbq/Jk/BlfYcahISicvI@romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8K7BsC01138; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:11:55 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8K7BmL24071; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:11:48 -0700 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:12:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020920071148.ZM24070@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "Re: [PATCH RFC] Character set support" (Sep 19, 9:12pm) References: <1020913003056.ZM15701@localhost.localdomain> <1020920003625.ZM23109@localhost.localdomain> <3D8A75F3.3040704@ges.redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Character set support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2 On Sep 19, 9:12pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > 2002-09-09 Elena Zannoni > > From: Emmanuel Thome' > * top.c (init_main): Set rl_terminal_name. > > to reflect both who committed and who created the change. Yes, I do it that way too from time to time usually for smaller changes that I might have to adapt somewhat. Jim's work is much more substantial and only minor changes were required. I felt that Jim's name should be prominent in the ChangeLog for this change. If you really need to know who committed a change, the CVS logs and mailing list traffic are available. Also, I believe there is ample precedent in other projects (e.g. gcc) for the way I did things. > Did the WCHAR problem get resolved? Yes, in the sense that we're taking Jim's patch as-is and we'll worry about wchar_t changes at some later date. See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00261.html Kevin