From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16712 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2002 17:07:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16702 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 17:07:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 17:07:52 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BGpOw24506 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:51:24 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BH7dd01690; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:07:39 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BH7XC19231; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:07:33 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8BH7Va16839; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:07:31 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:07:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020911170730.ZM16838@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Michal Ludvig "Re: Unreviewed patch" (Sep 11, 6:15pm) References: <20020829092527.I18764@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020829123940.J18764@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020911181503.U8357@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <1020911160608.ZM22194@localhost.localdomain> <3D7F6C12.2090806@suse.cz> To: Alan Modra Subject: Re: Unreviewed patch Cc: Michal Ludvig , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 On Sep 11, 6:15pm, Michal Ludvig wrote: > >>gdb/ChangeLog > >> * x86-64-tdep.c (_initialize_x86_64_tdep): Don't use hard-coded > >> mach constants. > >> > >>It's almost obvious, but I'm asking for permission to apply.. > > > > > > I'm not the maintainer of this file, but it looks good to me. > > Nobody is. Regarding to MAINTAINERS file, any maintainer can approve > changes to x86-64 target. Okay, approved then. Kevin