From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1810 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2002 16:06:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1801 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 16:06:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 16:06:25 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BFnvw09362 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:49:57 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BG6Id01279; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:06:18 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BG6CC17878; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:06:12 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8BG68E22195; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:06:08 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:06:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020911160608.ZM22194@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Alan Modra "Unreviewed patch" (Sep 11, 6:15pm) References: <20020829092527.I18764@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020829123940.J18764@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020911181503.U8357@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> To: Alan Modra , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Unreviewed patch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 On Sep 11, 6:15pm, Alan Modra wrote: > I had a gdb patch buried in > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00964.html > but apparently it was buried too deeply. > > Here's a revised version, that also removes the silly bfd_lookup_arch > call. > > gdb/ChangeLog > * x86-64-tdep.c (_initialize_x86_64_tdep): Don't use hard-coded > mach constants. > > It's almost obvious, but I'm asking for permission to apply.. I'm not the maintainer of this file, but it looks good to me. Kevin