From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12130 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2002 16:14:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12123 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2002 16:14:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Sep 2002 16:14:32 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g86FwT126352 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:58:30 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g86GEUd23533; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:14:30 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (IDENT:LhqHAvljcmO9n13qiq4/DpeIF9sVidzZ@romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g86GESj20026; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:14:28 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g86GEMJ26296; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:14:22 -0700 Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 09:14:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020906161422.ZM26295@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Pierre Muller "Re: New target method returning the name of the malloc function?" (Sep 6, 9:17am) References: <4.2.0.58.20020906091206.021019b8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> To: Pierre Muller , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: New target method returning the name of the malloc function? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 On Sep 6, 9:17am, Pierre Muller wrote: > >May I suggest a new architecture method called for instance > >NAME_OF_MALLOC or MALLOC_FUNCTION_NAME? The default would be to return > >"malloc", but we could then change it to "_malloc" for the interix > >target. > That would be great ! > Because Pascal also does not define malloc... This would suggest that something other than a target dependent method is needed. (It seems to me that it's both target and language dependent.) Kevin