From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28791 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2002 23:31:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28784 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2002 23:31:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2002 23:31:51 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7KNHWl15673 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:17:32 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7KNVlu01641; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:31:47 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7KNVke10962; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:31:46 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7KNVjI15651; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:31:45 -0700 Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:31:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020820233145.ZM15650@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Elena Zannoni "[RFA] rs6000-tdep.c: figure out e500 machine from bfd." (Aug 20, 6:36pm) References: <15714.50288.526139.379896@localhost.redhat.com> To: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] rs6000-tdep.c: figure out e500 machine from bfd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00637.txt.bz2 On Aug 20, 6:36pm, Elena Zannoni wrote: > + /* For e500 executables, the apuinfo section is of help here. */ > + if (info.abfd) > + { > + sect = bfd_get_section_by_name (info.abfd, ".PPC.EMB.apuinfo"); > + if (sect) What is the apuinfo section? If you know what it's about (I sure don't), consider expanding the comment somewhat. Is there any chance that this section could appear in non-e500 executables? If so, make a note of this gotcha in the comment too. Otherwise, fine. Go ahead and commit it after expanding the comment as necessary. Kevin