From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6223 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2002 18:29:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6215 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2002 18:29:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Aug 2002 18:29:36 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g79IGIl31053 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:16:19 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g79ITWu07236; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:29:32 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g79ITVe30672; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:29:31 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g79ITTl30256; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:29:29 -0700 Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 11:29:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020809182929.ZM30255@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney "Re: [RFA] Revise assertion in frame_saved_regs_register_unwind()" (Aug 9, 11:27am) References: <1020808210553.ZM24863@localhost.localdomain> <3D53DF70.6050209@ges.redhat.com> To: Andrew Cagney , Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: [RFA] Revise assertion in frame_saved_regs_register_unwind() Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2 On Aug 9, 11:27am, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > * blockframe.c (frame_saved_regs_register_unwind): Revise > > PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY_ASSERTION to only apply when generic dummy > > frames are in use. > > Yes. (Of course all targets should be using generic dummy frames but > until then :-). Committed.