From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-17352-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15936 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2002 22:55:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15929 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2002 22:55:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Aug 2002 22:55:33 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged))
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g75Mgfl26550
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:42:41 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g75MtUu07525;
	Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:55:31 -0400
Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (IDENT:9Qt7WPxwzRo8c/RXkKeO9OR0R+Tf1Xny@romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g75MtTB26383;
	Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:55:30 -0700
Received: (from kev@localhost)
	by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g75MtQ626570;
	Mon, 5 Aug 2002 15:55:26 -0700
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 15:55:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1020805225525.ZM26569@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
        "[rfa/testsuite] One pass/fail per expect list" (Jun 14,  3:46pm)
References: <3D0A4801.8030001@cygnus.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] One pass/fail per expect list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2

On Jun 14,  3:46pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> The attached tweaks gdb_expect_list{} so that it only prints one pass / 
> fail / ... message for the testcase.
> 
> What are peoples thoughts on this change and if positive, is the patch ok?

Now that it's in and I've had a chance to use it, the only part that
I don't like is:

> -		unresolved "${test}, pattern ${index} + sentinel"
> +		# unresolved "${test}, pattern ${index} + sentinel"

I found it useful to see the (potentially long list of) UNRESOLVED
messages after the FAIL so that I knew how many other parts of the
test hadn't been checked.

Kevin