From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27668 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2002 00:02:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27653 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2002 00:02:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Aug 2002 00:02:42 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g71NoBl21625 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:50:11 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7202du11471; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 20:02:39 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (IDENT:qKxQ3hvJOSQoctlrqsVqONQXgcXS3XY1@romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7202bm09091; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:02:38 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7202aP31038; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:02:36 -0700 Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:02:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020802000235.ZM31037@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Eric Christopher "Re: [RFA] mips_push_arguments(): Make O64 ABI test explicit" (Aug 1, 4:54pm) References: <1020731210452.ZM23445@localhost.localdomain> <3D486843.8007D610@redhat.com> <1020731232203.ZM24308@localhost.localdomain> <3D4870EB.BB9C282A@redhat.com> <1020801011054.ZM24816@localhost.localdomain> <1020801013004.ZM24890@localhost.localdomain> <20020801013959.GA15821@nevyn.them.org> <1028246063.29012.9.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> To: Eric Christopher , Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [RFA] mips_push_arguments(): Make O64 ABI test explicit Cc: Kevin Buettner , Michael Snyder , ac131313@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On Aug 1, 4:54pm, Eric Christopher wrote: > > inclined to go with SGI CC's interpretation; you should complain at > > Eric some more to get GCC fixed properly. Lord knows I haven't had > > much luck :P > > > > Yeesh. I'll get to it, as soon as you can fetch me a document describing > what should happen... (and no, "look at irix's compiler" is not a good > answer) ;) What about http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?coll=0650&db=bks&srch=&fname=/SGI_Developer/Mpro_n32_ABI/sgi_html/ch02.html ?