From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7198 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2002 23:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7191 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 23:22:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 23:22:09 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6VN9il18502 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:09:44 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6VNM6u02983; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:22:06 -0400 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6VNM5m01912; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:22:05 -0700 Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g6VNM3O24309; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:22:03 -0700 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:27:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020731232203.ZM24308@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Michael Snyder "Re: [RFA] mips_push_arguments(): Make O64 ABI test explicit" (Jul 31, 3:44pm) References: <1020731210452.ZM23445@localhost.localdomain> <3D486843.8007D610@redhat.com> To: Michael Snyder , Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: [RFA] mips_push_arguments(): Make O64 ABI test explicit Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00643.txt.bz2 On Jul 31, 3:44pm, Michael Snyder wrote: > > * mips-tdep.c (mips_push_arguments): Don't assume that > > ``MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE < 8'' means that the o64 abi is in use. > > Instead, test for it explicitly. > > Kevin, > > This change makes things worse for N32. I haven't tested > N64 yet. I think we're gonna have to look at these lines > from the perspective of all 3 (6) abis. Okay, this patch is withdrawn while I retest... To save some time, can you tell me which N32 regressions you see? Kevin