From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26314 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2002 21:29:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25873 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 21:28:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 21:28:14 -0000 Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA00245; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kev@localhost) by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3NLS7F10429; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:28:07 -0700 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:29:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020423212807.ZM10428@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Michael Snyder "[RFC] Time for a shared linux-nat.c module?" (Apr 23, 1:21pm) References: <3CC5C242.D975892F@redhat.com> To: Michael Snyder , gdb@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Time for a shared linux-nat.c module? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00881.txt.bz2 On Apr 23, 1:21pm, Michael Snyder wrote: > I notice that there are now a bunch of -linux-tdep.c > modules, and that some of them share a bunch of duplicate code. > > I'm wondering if it isn't time to create a linux-nat.c module, > shared by all host architectures, into which we can move > some of this code instead of maintaining separate, duplicate > versions. You meant a shared linux-tdep.c, right? (Not -nat.c) Assuming that this is the case, I think your idea makes sense. Kevin