From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16608 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2002 18:55:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16595 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2002 18:55:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2002 18:55:46 -0000 Received: from cse.cygnus.com (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA17218; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:55:44 -0800 (PST) Received: (from kev@localhost) by cse.cygnus.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2SItNA27448; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 11:55:23 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:55:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1020328185523.ZM27447@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Michael Snyder "Re: [patch/rfc] Delete write_fp() and friends" (Mar 28, 10:28am) References: <3CA28E57.9080108@cygnus.com> <3CA360CB.D9D579AA@redhat.com> To: Michael Snyder , Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Delete write_fp() and friends Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 On Mar 28, 10:28am, Michael Snyder wrote: > > Well, almost, I left dwarf2cfi.c's write_fp() as is - someone might be > > interested in the code. > > > > Assuming no issues are raised, and my builds come back clean, I'll > > commit it next week. > > So what should calls to write_fp be replaced with? It looks to me like there was only one call to write_fp() and that occurred in sparc-tdep.c. Andrew replaced that call with a call to write_register(). But, ahem, it would've been nice for Andrew to tell us this in the prefatory text preceding the patch. Kevin